|
|
Article: In defense of the search and seizure exclusionary rule. (Debate: Exclusionary Rules) (Federalist Society 2002 Symposium on Law and Truth)
- Article from:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
- Article date:
- January 1, 2003
- Author:
CopyrightCOPYRIGHT 2003 Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)
|
I.INTRODUCTION
II. THE PRE-MAPP ERA
III. THE LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNITY'S
REACTION TO MAPP
IV. HAS THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE INHIBITED THE
DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES ?
V.ARE TODAY'S POLITICIANS MORE LIKELY TO
IMPOSE EFFECTIVE "DIRECT SANCTIONS"
AGAINST THE POLICE THAN THE
POLITICIANS OF YESTERYEAR?
VI. POLICE PERJURY AND JUDICIAL "WINKING"
VII. THE COSTS OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE
VIII. JUDGE CALABRESI'S PROPOSAL
I. INTRODUCTION (1)
About a quarter-century ago, after my co-authors and I had published the fourth edition of our criminal procedure casebook, (2) I attended a conference with A. Kenneth ...