Article: Is marriage protected under the constitution?

"Is a constitutional amendment required to change the common law definition of marriage, or can a reformulation be accomplished by Parliament or the courts?" This is one of the six questions that the Court of Appeal for Ontario (CAO) raised in making its judgement on the same-sex dispute. This question is framed because the Association for Marriage and Family in Ontario argued that the legal definition of marriage--the union of one man and one woman is a constitutionally entrenched term, defined in the Constitution Act/1867. In other words, neither Parliament nor the courts have jurisdiction to reformulate the meaning of marriage.

The Court of Appeal's reasoning ...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles:

 
 
Newsweek Harper's Magazine The Washington Post Chicago Tribune Crain's Chicago Business PRNewswire Pediatric News The Nation Advertising Age The Economist (US) A FREE trial gives you access to over 80 million articles! Access over 6,500 publications with a FREE trial!