Article: California court rules tissue banks are immune from strict liability; national implications uncertain.

Much in the same way a person's immune system can reject a transplant, tissue banks are legally immune to liability claims if one of their transplanted tissue products is tainted by disease, a California appeals court has ruled.

Distribution of tissue transplantation is a "service," not a sale of goods, thus tissue banks are not strictly responsible for product liability, according to the California Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District.

A petition for review of the case was filed August 29th in the California Supreme Court.

The ruling overturned a strict liability and punitive damage claim against CryoLife, Inc., an Atlanta-based ...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles:

 
 
Newsweek Harper's Magazine The Washington Post Chicago Tribune Crain's Chicago Business PRNewswire Pediatric News The Nation Advertising Age The Economist (US) A FREE trial gives you access to over 80 million articles! Access over 6,500 publications with a FREE trial!