|
|
Article: From time to time, the journalist Andrew Sullivan makes the argument that the establishment of gay marriage, for which he is a prominent polemicist, is the only way of preventing a proliferation of marriage-lite alternatives such as civil unions and domestic partnerships.
- Article from:
- National Review
- Article date:
- February 23, 2004
CopyrightCOPYRIGHT 2004 National Review, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)
|
* From time to time, the journalist Andrew Sullivan makes the argument that the establishment of gay marriage, for which he is a prominent polemicist, is the only way of preventing a proliferation of marriage-lite alternatives such as civil unions and domestic partnerships. In a recent squib, he wrote that National Review is so hostile to gay marriage that we, "bizarrely," favor the creation of "new and more elaborate marriage-lite options for gays and straights." That would be bizarre, if true. Let us clarify our position. We favor a constitutional amendment as the only means to prevent federal and state judges from imposing gay marriage or marriage-lite without a vote ...
Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles:
|