Article: Supreme Court Gives Okay to Disparate Impact Claims under the ADEA.

Originally published April 4, 2005

On March 30, 2005, the United States Supreme Court resolved a split among the federal appellate courts over whether the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) allowed workers age 40 and over to bring discrimination claims by showing that a facially neutral policy or practice had a disproportionate adverse impact on older workers (a "disparate impact" claim), without any evidence of discriminatory intent. In an earlier decision, the Supreme Court held that disparate impact claims were available under Title VII, but before this year it had not addressed whether such claims were available under the ADEA. In Smith v. ...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles:

 
 
Newsweek Harper's Magazine The Washington Post Chicago Tribune Crain's Chicago Business PRNewswire Pediatric News The Nation Advertising Age The Economist (US) A FREE trial gives you access to over 80 million articles! Access over 6,500 publications with a FREE trial!