Article: Nixon's payoff. (Richard Nixon and the White House tapes) (Editorial)

The decision of three U.S. Court of Appeals judges that Richard Nixon should be paid for the White House tapes seized by the government may be legally correct, but it flouts justice and common sense. It also reduces to absurdity the shaky "custom" under which Presidents are granted ownership of their papers.

The tapes, which contained revelations about the Watergate cover-up, were seized by order of Congress, along with other materials, to prevent tampering. The Appeals Court says the impoundment amounted to a "taking" of the ex-President's property, and under the Fifth Amendment, he should be compensated. Instant guesstimates were that Nixon might collect ...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles:

 
 
Newsweek Harper's Magazine The Washington Post Chicago Tribune Crain's Chicago Business PRNewswire Pediatric News The Nation Advertising Age The Economist (US) A FREE trial gives you access to over 80 million articles! Access over 6,500 publications with a FREE trial!