|
|
Article: HIGH COURT KEEPS SHIRT INADMISSIBLE STATE SUPREME COURT FORCED TO RECONSIDER CASE AFTER U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION.(LOCAL/WISCONSIN)
- Article from:
- The Wisconsin State Journal (Madison, WI)
- Article date:
- July 15, 2005
CopyrightCOPYRIGHT 2005 Capital Newspapers. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)
|
Byline: JR Ross Associated Press
The Wisconsin Supreme court ruled Thursday for a second time that Jefferson County prosecutors cannot use a bloodied sweat shirt in the trial of a Watertown man accused of a 1987 murder.
The court first voted 6-1 in 2003 to bar the shirt in the trial of Matthew Knapp, ruling authorities could not use physical evidence obtained before giving him the Miranda warning, which begins, "You have the right to remain silent." DNA tests showed the shirt had the victim's blood on it.
But the U.S. Supreme Court forced the state justices to reconsider their decision after it ruled last year in a Colorado case that evidence ...