Article: Supreme Court limits breadth of Robinson-Patman Act in competitive bidding situations.(Volvo Trucks North America Inc. accused by Reeder-Simco GMC Inc. for price discrimination against dealers)

Originally published 26 Jan 2006

On January 10, 2006, the Supreme Court held that a manufacturer may not be held liable for secondary-line price discrimination (price discrimination that injures competition among the discriminating seller's customers) under the Robinson-Patman Act, in the absence of a showing that the manufacturer discriminated between dealers competing to resell its product to the same retail customer. This decision makes clear that each individual bidding situation is the appropriate relevant market for determining whether a manufacturer impermissibly price discriminated among its resellers.

Background

This case arose in the ...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles:

 
 
Newsweek Harper's Magazine The Washington Post Chicago Tribune Crain's Chicago Business PRNewswire Pediatric News The Nation Advertising Age The Economist (US) A FREE trial gives you access to over 80 million articles! Access over 6,500 publications with a FREE trial!