|
|
Article: Golden Blount II: Federal Circuit Agrees-in-Part with District Court After Remand for Sufficient Reasoning.(Golden Blount Inc. and Robert H. Peterson Co.'s patent infringement case)
- Article from:
- Mondaq Business Briefing
- Article date:
- March 8, 2006
CopyrightCOPYRIGHT 2006 Mondaq Ltd. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)
|
Addressing for the second time the district court's findings on infringement and willfulness, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's findings as to those issues, vacated-in-part the district court's lost profits damages calculation and remanded the case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether certain products should be included in that calculation. Golden Blount, Inc. v. Robert H. Peterson Co., Case No. 04-1609, 05-1141, 05-1202 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 15, 2006) (Linn, J.) (Golden Blount II). Interpreting Knorr-Bremse, the Federal Circuit found its prior ruling only precludes an inference that an undisclosed ...