Article: Standard of proof for increased risk of disease or injury.

CLAIMS for the increased risk of future disease often are predicated on the assertion that the plaintiff has been exposed to a carcinogen and, as a result, has an increased risk of contracting some form of cancer. Historically, courts did not recognize claims for increased or enhanced risk of future disease by themselves, holding that there was no injury.(1) As Dean Prosser stated, "the threat of future harm, not yet realized, is not enough."(2)

TRADITION GIVES WAY

Under traditional tort principles, claimants did not have causes of action until they contracted the disease. This rule avoided the problem of trying to prove highly speculative damages.(3) ...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles:

 
 
Newsweek Harper's Magazine The Washington Post Chicago Tribune Crain's Chicago Business PRNewswire Pediatric News The Nation Advertising Age The Economist (US) A FREE trial gives you access to over 80 million articles! Access over 6,500 publications with a FREE trial!