Article: Contribution of cadimum in cigarettes to lung cancer: an evaluation of risk assessment methodologies.

CANCER RISKS from low-level exposures to chemicals in the environment are usually too small to study by epidemiologic methods. For this reason, risks from low, e.g., environmental, levels are extrapolated from studies of higher exposures. Critics of risk assessment have contended that standard methods for extrapolating from high-dose animal studies are not justified scientifically.[1,2] Unfortunately, direct validation of risk estimates is often impractical.

Nevertheless, in some situations, an upper bound on risk can be inferred. For instance, no single constituent in cigarette smoke could be responsible for more than the total smoking-induced lung cancer ...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles:

 
 
Newsweek Harper's Magazine The Washington Post Chicago Tribune Crain's Chicago Business PRNewswire Pediatric News The Nation Advertising Age The Economist (US) A FREE trial gives you access to over 80 million articles! Access over 6,500 publications with a FREE trial!