Newspaper article from our research archive:

Where Plaintiff operator of London Futures Exchange employed Defendant in position involving innovation, English Court of Appeal, Civil Division, holds that, under English patent statute, Plaintiff owned Defendant's inventions dealing with electronic trading of various forms of futures contracts so that Defendant was unable to obtain U.S. patents on his system.(Patents Act 1977)

The Plaintiff below was LIFFE Administration and Management, the operator of the London Futures Exchange. In July 2001, it had hired Dr. Pavel Pinkava (Defendant) as a manager in its Interest Rate Product (IRP) Management Team. By July 2004, Defendant had come up with a system which enabled the trading on an electronic exchange of various financial instruments not previously traded. Plaintiff promoted Defendant to senior manager in September 2004.

In January 2005, Defendant notified Plaintiff that he, not Plaintiff, was entitled to own the system and related inventions. The usual rule under English common and statutory law was that the development of inventions in the ...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles:

See all results. Or, try our Advanced Search.

Newsweek Harper's Magazine The Washington Post Chicago Tribune Crain's Chicago Business PRNewswire Pediatric News The Nation Advertising Age The Economist (US) A FREE trial gives you access to over 60 million articles! Access over 3,500 publications with a FREE trial!