Dear Editor,

In his article in the Winter 2007 issue of ReVision, Randy P. Conner makes a few criticisms of my views. I have been invited to reply by the issue's Guest Editor, Gregg Lahood.

Conner writes that I "[do] not grant the innumerable unfolding divine manifestations their own fullness ... [do] not acknowledge the potential fullness or wholeness of each divine manifestation" (2007, 24). To support this charge, he quotes only one sentence: "The infinitude of divine wholeness manifests as innumerable unfolding divine partialities" (Heron 1998, 247) and develops his critique by a repeated reference to what he thinks is my notion of "divine partialities."

This ...