|
|
The odious debt doctrine after Iraq.
- Article from:
-
Law and Contemporary Problems
- Article date:
-
September 22, 2007
- Author:
- Damle, Jai
|
Copyright informationCOPYRIGHT 2007 Duke University, School of Law. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)
|
I
INTRODUCTION
The odious debt doctrine has experienced renewed popularity in the past few years; it has been heralded by academics, political commentators, economists, and politicians as a mechanism to alleviate burdens imposed by illegitimate rulers. In its classic formulation, the doctrine provides that a regime's debt is odious, and thus unenforceable, if the state's people did not consent to the debt, the proceeds from the debt were not used for the benefit of the people, and the regime's creditors had knowledge of the first two conditions. (1) Scholars and policy makers have made advances in defining the doctrine and proposing mechanisms for its application to ...