Universal screening renews HIV debate.(GUEST EDITORIAL)

When a person discloses a positive HIV status to a partner, the disclosure eliminates many of the moral, ethical, and legal considerations inherent in the opposite scenario. Just what is our responsibility as physicians in this regard? Do we have a duty to protect and warn the known sexual partners of a nondisclosing, HIV-positive person? Such actions can breach the therapeutic alliance between doctor and patient, but not disclosing has the potential to place a third party at risk.

I've found that nondisclosure on the part of patients to partners is common. When I was on the hospital ethics committee at the Harvard-affiliated Cambridge Health Alliance, for example, cases ...

More articles like this:

Loading
We're searching over:
  • 60 million articles
  • 3,500 publications


Newsweek Harper's Magazine The Washington Post Chicago Tribune Crain's Chicago Business PRNewswire Pediatric News The Nation Advertising Age The Economist (US) Register Register