|
|
Transparency is the solution, not the problem: a reply to Bruce Green.(response to article in this issue, p. 1605)
- Article from:
-
Stanford Law Review
- Article date:
-
April 1, 2008
- Author:
-
|
Copyright informationCOPYRIGHT 2008 Stanford Law School. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)
|
INTRODUCTION
I. LEEDS, MORELLI & BROWN AND THE NEXTEL SETTLEMENT
A. Information
B. "Factual Unreliability"
C. "Legal Unreliability"
II. THE ROLE OF THE EXPERT WITNESS
A. Publicity and Credibility
B. Litigation Process and Accountability
CONCLUSION
INTRODUCTION
I fear that the diffuse and ad hominem tendencies of Bruce Green's reply will distract attention from the core issues I sought to discuss.
First, I argued that issues of professional and academic integrity and accountability are raised when lawyers give advice with certain third-party effects under conditions of partial or complete secrecy. I proposed a variety of soft norms, ...