|
|
Article: Rejoinder to the responses.(Part 1)
- Article from:
- Style
- Article date:
- June 22, 2008
- Author:
CopyrightCOPYRIGHT 2008 Northern Illinois University. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)
|
1. The Range of Response
Before taking up particular issues raised in the responses, I shall sort them roughly into four groups distinguished by hypothetical ratings they might have assigned to the contentions in the target article: (1) Reject, (2) Revise and Resubmit, (3) Accept with Some Revision, and (4) Accept. In the "Reject" group, I would locate three responses, those by GOODHEART, SEAMON, and SPOLSKY. They aim at general, across-the-board repudiation. "Revise and Resubmit" could be defined as "cautious partial acceptance, with some substantial reservations." This description could be applied to the responses by CREWS, HOGAN, JACKSON, JANNIDIS, and ...