Article: The Fourth Amendment and traffic stops: bright-line rules in conjunction with the totality of the circumstances test.(Supreme Court Review)(Case Note)

I. INTRODUCTION

In Ohio v. Robinette,(1) the United States Supreme Court addressed whether a law enforcement officer must advise a detained motorist that he is "free to go" before the motorist's consent to search will be recognized as voluntary.(2) The Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require the application of any such bright-line rule, but rather is based on a fact-specific reasonableness inquiry.(3) In so deciding, the Court further expanded the power of law enforcement officers to detain motorists as defined in Whren v. United States(4) and Schneckloth v. Bustamonte.(5) The Robinette Court held that the Ohio Supreme Court's application of a ...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles:

 
 
Newsweek Harper's Magazine The Washington Post Chicago Tribune Crain's Chicago Business PRNewswire Pediatric News The Nation Advertising Age The Economist (US) A FREE trial gives you access to over 80 million articles! Access over 6,500 publications with a FREE trial!