|
|
Article: The Poll; Last week's question: Should Tiger Woods' capture of four consecutive majors be considered a Grand Slam?(Sports)
- Article from:
- The Boston Herald
- Article date:
- April 22, 2001
CopyrightCOPYRIGHT 2001 Boston Herald. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)
|
RESPONSES: 56% YES, 44% NO
No asterisk needed
Positively. Simply because some petty "purists" feel that Tiger's fabulous accomplishments did not occur within one calendar year does not diminish them one iota.
How could it not be "a Grand Slam?" Using their reasoning, a consecutive home run streak or pitching consecutive no-hitters in different calendar years would require an asterisk.
-- Bill Mullen, Lowell
No grandstanding needed
No, Tiger Woods amazing run of four consecutive major victories should not be considered a Grand Slam.
Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles:
|
|
Article: IN GRAND SLAM SUMMER, TIGER (RE)TAILS; NIKE'S ...
Daily News Record;
August 7, 2000 ;
700+ words
...Tiger Woods has already printed his ... complete golf's career Grand Slam. His impact on fashion ... Opens. For Nike, the Tiger Woods Collection is positioned ... like the golfer, the Tiger Woods Collection has grown up ...
|
|