Article: Supreme Court rules against cellular-phone privacy.

WASHINGTON--The U.S. Supreme Court in a 6-3 ruling said last week that restricting the broadcasting or publication of an illegally intercepted cellular-phone conversation violated the First Amendment because the contents of the call were of public significance.

The Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association said the decision was narrow enough to keep in place the privacy protections of private individuals involved in private conversations.

"We lost, but the scope of the decision was narrowed so as to limit its applicability and continue privacy protection," said Michael F. Altschul, CTIA senior vice president and general counsel.

...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles:

 
 
Newsweek Harper's Magazine The Washington Post Chicago Tribune Crain's Chicago Business PRNewswire Pediatric News The Nation Advertising Age The Economist (US) A FREE trial gives you access to over 80 million articles! Access over 6,500 publications with a FREE trial!