|
|
Article: The regular education initiative and patent medicine: a rejoinder to Algozzine, Maheady, Sacca, O'Shea, and O'Shea. (Comment)
- Article from:
- Exceptional Children
- Article date:
- April 1, 1990
- Author:
CopyrightCOPYRIGHT 1990 Council for Exceptional Children. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)
|
The Regular Education Initiative and Patent Medicine: A Rejoinder to Algozzine, Maheady, Sacca, O'Shea, and O'Shea
MISREADING OR MISINTERPRETATION
It is apparent from their commentary that Algozzine et al. misread or misinterpreted our position on important points. For example, from the following sentence, Algozzine et al. chose to quote only the part we enclose here in brackets: "We do agree that [the mainstream is most appropriate for many handicapped students] and that no students should be removed from the regular class until it is clear that effective programming cannot be provided there" (Braaten et al., 1988, p. 23). Our argument is not that ...