|
|
Article: Md. Court of Special Appeals: Mirjafari v. Cohn, et al.
- Article from:
- The Daily Record (Baltimore)
- Article date:
- January 20, 2009
CopyrightCopyright 2009 The Daily Record (Baltimore). Provided by ProQuest LLC. (Hide copyright information)
|
Real Property
Foreclosure
BOTTOM LINE: Court of Special Appeals dismissed appeal where
party who lost real property in foreclosure failed to post
supersedeas bond challenging ratification of foreclosure sale, and
no exception applied.
CASE: Mirjafari v. Cohn, et al., CSA No. 2977, September Term,
2007 (filed Jan. 5, 2009) (Judges Eyler, J., Salmon, & RUBIN
(specially assigned)).
FACTS: Maziar and Seyed Mirjafari owned investment property
located at 1700 Melrose Lane, Forest Hills, Maryland. The property
was purchased, in 2002, by the Mirjafaris' uncle, Mansour Mirjafari,
for $245,000, but was titled in the Mirjafaris' names.
In 2006, the Mirjafaris took out a mortgage with Home Equity ...