In mid December, The San Francisco Chronicle ran one of those stories that jump out at you because they directly contradict politically correct values on a very sensitive subject, but for some reason they do not seem to cause an outcry. When this happens, experience has shown that feminists are up to something, and sure enough, they are. If I tell you the title of the article was "Male Circumcision Shows Promise as Defence Against HIV Transmission" (14th December, 2006), perhaps you will begin to understand. It's that sexist double standard again, folks.
Apparently two major studies of male circumcision in Africa have found that the "simple procedure" (ie the genital mutilation of men) ...