Magazine article from our research archive:

Case One: Patient Interests and Medical Paternalism

A 16-year-old Hodgkin lymphoma patient refuses to have his blood specimen drawn, thus canceling his scheduled oncologic treatment. As a 16-year-old, he has no legal standing as an adult. His parents are split over his decision. One supports his right to choose; the other wishes the specimen to be drawn and the chemotherapy reinstated. The physicians at the hospital are seeking legal redress to have the court order the blood specimens to be taken.

INDEX TERMS: autonomy; bioethics; informed consent; Kant; Mill; utilitarianism.

Clin Lab Sci 2008;21(2):116

The most fundamental question presented by this case is, "Who is in position to judge what is in the patient's best interest?" To many, the ...

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles:

See all results. Or, try our Advanced Search.

Newsweek Harper's Magazine The Washington Post Chicago Tribune Crain's Chicago Business PRNewswire Pediatric News The Nation Advertising Age The Economist (US) A FREE trial gives you access to over 60 million articles! Access over 3,500 publications with a FREE trial!