|
|
Article: Very poor phorm
- Article from:
- New Statesman
- Article date:
- October 6, 2008
- Author:
CopyrightCopyright New Statesman Ltd. Oct 6, 2008. Provided by ProQuest LLC. (Hide copyright information)
|
REBOOT
Advertisers should not be allowed to spy on net users' browsing habits, writes Becky Hogge
Isn't online advertising marvellous? I go to the New Statesman website to look up the article I wrote on Phorm, the behavioural targeting advertising company, in March 2008. And there it is, right at the top of the page: a Google ad for Phorm. That Phorm is advertising using the company it intends to treat as its first true competitor is as ironic as the Phorm tagline, "Creating two revolutions: in online advertising and in privacy."
Well, perhaps not ironic. Phorm can claim privacy-enhancing features for its web -tracking service, but they are j ust that "enhancing", not "guaranteeing". And ...