HighBeam Research - Newspaper archives and journal articles
Options
Cancel changes
Follow us:
  • Subscription benefits
  • Log in
  • Sign up for a free, 7-day trial
  • Publications
  • Research topics
  • Topics home
  • People
    • Artists and Entertainers
    • Company executives
    • Historical figures
    • Politicians and Government officials
    • World Leaders
  • Issues and Events
    • Health and Medicine
    • Historical Events
    • Religion and Theology
    • Science and Technology
  • Places
  • Organizations
  • A-Z
    • A-G
    • H-O
    • P-T
    • U-Z
    • 0-9
  • Publications home
  • Journals
    • Academic journals
    • Business journals
    • Education journals
    • Math and Engineering journals
    • Medical journals
    • Science and Technology journals
    • Trade journals
  • Magazines
    • Business magazines
    • Computer magazines
    • Education magazines
    • Industry magazines
    • Lifestyle magazines
    • Medical magazines
  • Newspapers
    • International newspapers and newswires
    • Reports, newsletters, and transcripts
    • U.K. newspapers
    • U.S. newspapers and newswires
  • Reference works and books
    • Almanacs
    • Dictionaries and thesauruses
    • Encyclopedias
    • Non-fiction books
  • Subscription benefits
  • Log in
  • PUBLICATIONS HOME
  • Journals
    • Academic journals
    • Business journals
    • Education journals
    • Math and Engineering journals
    • Medical journals
    • Science and Technology journals
    • Trade journals
  • Magazines
    • Business magazines
    • Computer magazines
    • Education magazines
    • Industry magazines
    • Lifestyle magazines
    • Medical magazines
  • Newspapers
    • International newspapers and newswires
    • Reports, newsletters, and transcripts
    • U.K. newspapers
    • U.S. newspapers and newswires
  • Reference works and books
    • Almanacs
    • Dictionaries and thesauruses
    • Encyclopedias
    • Non-fiction books
Home » Publications » Math and Engineering journals » EE-Evaluation Engineering » March 2009 »
  • Save
    This article has been saved!
    You may organize and add notes about this article below.
    This article has been saved!
    View all saved articles
  • Export

    To export this article to Microsoft Word, please log in or subscribe.

    Have an account? Please log in

    Not a subscriber? Sign up today

  • Print
  • Cite

    MLA

    VanNewkirk, John. "Making test lean again.(DESIGN FOR TEST)(Lean manufacturing)." EE-Evaluation Engineering. NP Communications, LLC. 2009. HighBeam Research. 19 Apr. 2018 <https://www.highbeam.com>.

    Chicago

    VanNewkirk, John. "Making test lean again.(DESIGN FOR TEST)(Lean manufacturing)." EE-Evaluation Engineering. 2009. HighBeam Research. (April 19, 2018). https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-195341385.html

    APA

    VanNewkirk, John. "Making test lean again.(DESIGN FOR TEST)(Lean manufacturing)." EE-Evaluation Engineering. NP Communications, LLC. 2009. Retrieved April 19, 2018 from HighBeam Research: https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-195341385.html

    Please use HighBeam citations as a starting point only. Not all required citation information is available for every article, and citation requirements change over time.

Making test lean again.(DESIGN FOR TEST)(Lean manufacturing)

EE-Evaluation Engineering
EE-Evaluation Engineering

See all results for this publication

Browse back issues of this publication by date

March 1, 2009 | VanNewkirk, John | Copyright
COPYRIGHT 2009 Nelson Publishing. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights or concerns about this content should be directed to Customer Service.
  • Permalink

    Create a link to this page

    Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:

    <a href="https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-195341385.html" title="Making test lean again.(DESIGN FOR TEST)(Lean manufacturing) | HighBeam Research">Making test lean again.(DESIGN FOR TEST)(Lean manufacturing)</a>

Circuit board test, like any step in the PCB assembly process, benefits from lean manufacturing practices that continually improve process steps. If lean manufacturing principles were applied to circuit board test, what would a lean test strategy and test platform look like? A viable option is an efficient implementation of lean board test that uses an open platform board test (OPBT) architecture.

The End of the In-Circuit Era

The need to get more done with fewer resources has driven important strategic shifts through the history of circuit board test. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, increasingly complex boards populated with early microprocessors began outstripping the capabilities of digital functional testers. By the mid-1980s, in-circuit testers with their lower capital cost, much simpler programming, and fault coverage aligned to common manufacturing faults had supplanted digital functional testers in the PCB assembly process.

As component and board technology advanced, so did in-circuit tester capability--and complexity. By the mid-1990s, in-circuit test (ICT) platforms were chockablock with capabilities like backdrive digital vector test and variants such as combinational test that eventually made in-circuit testers as expensive, complicated, and costly to deploy as their digital functional predecessors. Once again, developing and debugging test programs took weeks, and maintenance and support costs grew as well.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Today, these capable but expensive traditional ICT platforms make up the majority of the worldwide in-circuit installed base. Regardless of the complexity or cost, most test engineers consider ICT a solved problem and have turned their attention elsewhere.

But current economic and technical realities are bringing the era of traditional in-circuit testers to an end as surely as the digital functional testers they once replaced. Here's why:

Loss of Electrical Access to Circuit Nodes

Increasingly complex components are packed more densely into shrinking board dimensions. The price of miniaturization is ever decreasing electrical accessibility by ICT bed-of-nails test fixtures, leading to reduced fault coverage.

The Shift in the Manufacturing Fault Spectrum

Even as board technology has grown in complexity, automated assembly and improved component quality have increased manufacturing yields and changed the traditional proportions of component and assembly process defects. For example, while improved device quality has made digital defects almost nonexistent, relatively more mechanical and solder-quality defects now occur. …


To read the full text of this article and others like it, subscribe today!



Related articles on HighBeam Research

See all related articles »

Publication Finder

Browse back issues from our extensive library of more than 6,500 trusted publications.

Popular publicationson HighBeam Research

Daily Mail (London)
U.K. newspapers
The Christian Science Monitor
Religious magazines
The Washington Post
Washington D.C. newspapers
The Mirror (London, England)
U.K. newspapers
Harper's Magazine
Cultural magazines
Visit Cengage Brain
  • Company
  • About us
  • Subscription benefits
  • Group subscriptions
  • Careers
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Help topics
  • FAQ
  • Search tips
  • Using the Research Center
  • Billing questions
  • Rights inquiries
  • Customer Service
  • Cengage Learning Network
  • Questia
  • CengageBrain.com
  • HighBeam Business
  • ed2go
  • MiLadyPro
  •  
HighBeam Research
Follow us:

HighBeam Research is operated by Cengage Learning. © Copyright 2018. All rights reserved.

The HighBeam advertising network includes: womensforum.com GlamFamily