HighBeam Research - Newspaper archives and journal articles
Options
Cancel changes
Follow us:
  • Subscription benefits
  • Log in
  • Sign up for a free, 7-day trial
  • Publications
  • Research topics
  • Topics home
  • People
    • Artists and Entertainers
    • Company executives
    • Historical figures
    • Politicians and Government officials
    • World Leaders
  • Issues and Events
    • Health and Medicine
    • Historical Events
    • Religion and Theology
    • Science and Technology
  • Places
  • Organizations
  • A-Z
    • A-G
    • H-O
    • P-T
    • U-Z
    • 0-9
  • Publications home
  • Journals
    • Academic journals
    • Business journals
    • Education journals
    • Math and Engineering journals
    • Medical journals
    • Science and Technology journals
    • Trade journals
  • Magazines
    • Business magazines
    • Computer magazines
    • Education magazines
    • Industry magazines
    • Lifestyle magazines
    • Medical magazines
  • Newspapers
    • International newspapers and newswires
    • Reports, newsletters, and transcripts
    • U.K. newspapers
    • U.S. newspapers and newswires
  • Reference works and books
    • Almanacs
    • Dictionaries and thesauruses
    • Encyclopedias
    • Non-fiction books
  • Subscription benefits
  • Log in
  • PUBLICATIONS HOME
  • Journals
    • Academic journals
    • Business journals
    • Education journals
    • Math and Engineering journals
    • Medical journals
    • Science and Technology journals
    • Trade journals
  • Magazines
    • Business magazines
    • Computer magazines
    • Education magazines
    • Industry magazines
    • Lifestyle magazines
    • Medical magazines
  • Newspapers
    • International newspapers and newswires
    • Reports, newsletters, and transcripts
    • U.K. newspapers
    • U.S. newspapers and newswires
  • Reference works and books
    • Almanacs
    • Dictionaries and thesauruses
    • Encyclopedias
    • Non-fiction books
Home » Publications » Academic journals » Economics journals » Economic Review (Kansas City, MO) »
  • Save
    This article has been saved!
    You may organize and add notes about this article below.
    This article has been saved!
    View all saved articles
  • Export

    To export this article to Microsoft Word, please log in or subscribe.

    Have an account? Please log in

    Not a subscriber? Sign up today

  • Print
  • Cite

    MLA

    Melek, Nida Cakir. "What Could Lower Prices Mean for U.S. Oil Production?." Economic Review (Kansas City, MO). Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. 2015. HighBeam Research. 19 Apr. 2018 <https://www.highbeam.com>.

    Chicago

    Melek, Nida Cakir. "What Could Lower Prices Mean for U.S. Oil Production?." Economic Review (Kansas City, MO). 2015. HighBeam Research. (April 19, 2018). https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-427962383.html

    APA

    Melek, Nida Cakir. "What Could Lower Prices Mean for U.S. Oil Production?." Economic Review (Kansas City, MO). Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. 2015. Retrieved April 19, 2018 from HighBeam Research: https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-427962383.html

    Please use HighBeam citations as a starting point only. Not all required citation information is available for every article, and citation requirements change over time.

What Could Lower Prices Mean for U.S. Oil Production?

Economic Review (Kansas City, MO)
Economic Review (Kansas City, MO)

See all results for this publication

Browse back issues of this publication by date

January 1, 2015 | Melek, Nida Cakir | Copyright
Copyright Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights or concerns about this content should be directed to Customer Service.
  • Permalink

    Create a link to this page

    Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:

    <a href="https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-427962383.html" title="What Could Lower Prices Mean for U.S. Oil Production? | HighBeam Research">What Could Lower Prices Mean for U.S. Oil Production?</a>

Oil prices have declined sharply since the summer of 2014, raising questions about whether the boom in oil and gas production can continue. Since 2005, U.S. oil and gas production has increased more than 50 percent. The share of oil and gas in private fixed investment increased from 2.9 percent in 2005 to 5.8 percent in 2013. With oil prices at about half their summer 2014 level, will the investment continue to be profitable and boost production?

The dramatic increase in production post-2005 became possible when high and rising energy prices allowed two complementary but expensive technologies--multistage hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling--to be applied on a large scale for the first time. Energy producers were able to access previously untapped reservoirs using the newly profitable technologies, first in shale gas fields such as the Barnett field of east Texas, and then in tight oil fields such as the Bakken in North Dakota. Since 2011, over 95 percent of the growth in U.S. oil and gas production has come from these unconventional sources. To continue this growth, however, energy prices must remain high enough to justify the costs of extraction. Shale fields require significant drilling activity and thus significant ongoing capital investment to increase, much less maintain, production levels. Moreover, the cost of an unconventional well could be as high as five times the cost of a conventional well.

The recent sharp decline in oil prices and drop in oil rig counts have called into question whether oil production will continue to increase in 2015. This article estimates that, despite highly productive new wells and an increase in the number of wells drilled per rig, U.S. oil production could decline from 0.7 to 8 percent in 2015, due in part to the significant decline in rig counts and depletion in existing wells. While the 0.7 to 8 percent range appears wide, it reflects uncertainty regarding productivity gains in the sector over a one-year period as well as how much further rig counts could decline. For production to increase in 2015, rig efficiency and initial well production would need to increase markedly or the decline in rig counts would need to halt.

Section I reviews the key technologies driving the recent boom and describes tight oil and shale gas field characteristics. Section II investigates the trends in energy prices and production in the U.S. oil and gas sector since 1990. Section III examines the implications of the recent oil price decline for drilling activity and U.S. oil production.

I. Tight Oil and Shale Gas

The recent growth in U.S. oil and natural gas production reflects a move toward shale gas and tight oil extraction. Shale gas is natural gas trapped deep within shale formations, while tight oil is oil produced from low-permeability source rocks deep within the earth. Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing have made these fields accessible (see Box for a description of these technologies). In 2000, shale gas provided only 1 percent of U.S. natural gas production; in 2010, it provided over 20 percent.

Although companies have only recently developed horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing on a large scale, the technologies have existed for over 50 years. When U.S. oil and gas production started to decline in the 1970s, producers searched for other sources of domestic production. (1) A combination of private and government funding contributed to improvements in the late 1970s. (2) Output nearly stabilized in the 1990s as a result of both management and technological advancements in the oil and gas sector (Bohi). (3)

Box

Overview of Key Technologies

The key technologies that contributed to the oil and gas boom are
horizontal drilling, hydraulic fracturing, and pad drilling.

Horizontal wells typically start vertically and then curve to
horizontal at depth to follow a particular reservoir (Hughes
2013a). The first horizontal oil well was drilled in 1929, but the
commercial application was not developed until the 1980s. The
development of supportive technologies--including three-dimensional
seismology, measurement-while-drilling (MWD), and steerable
drilling motors--played an important role in the process.
Three-dimensional (3D) seismology information, obtained by sensors
sent into the earth, is used to determine where to locate a well,
how many wells to drill, and how to drill the well for maximum
production (Wang and Krupnick). An MWD package, or downhole
instrument package, transmits sensor readings of the drill bit
location to the surface. Additional sensors in the drill string
also provide real time information on the downhole environment and
physical characteristics. Using the data from the MWD package, the
direction of the hole can then be controlled with a steerable
motor.

Hydraulic fracturing ("fracking') is the process of inducing
fractures in reservoir rocks through the injection of fluids,
chemicals, and solids under very high pressure. A mixture of sand
and other granular materials creates or holds open fractures in the
rock to allow the hydrocarbons to flow freely to the well. The
first experiments with hydraulic fracturing took place in 1947 and
marginal developments followed. Mitchell Energy began large-scale
testing of the technology in 1978 with the Department of Energy's
support (Wang and Krupnick). The knowledge developed during that
test was then transferred to other unconventional areas. As with
horizontal drilling, 3D seismology supported hydraulic fracturing
by giving developers a better understanding of the geology of the
reservoir and how best to stimulate it. … 


To read the full text of this article and others like it, subscribe today!



Related articles on HighBeam Research

Natural Gas Week
Green report suggests shale gas production in US poised to decline.

Natural Gas Week; May 23, 2011

By Seeley, Rachael; 700+ words
A new report by the California-based Post Carbon Institute suggests that domestic production of shale gas will not be sufficient to displace consumption of other fossil fuels in the US. The report, Will Natural Gas Fuel America in the 21st Century, takes issue with the notion that natural gas could…
Pipeline & Gas Journal
EU Domestic Shale Gas Production Could Add 1 Million Jobs

Pipeline & Gas Journal; April 1, 2014

427 words
Shale gas in Europe could add as many as 1 million jobs to the economy, make industry more competitive and decrease the region's dependence on energy imports, according to a new study. The research, commissioned by OGP and carried out by the independent consultancies Poyry Management Consulting and…
States News Service
Future U.S. Tight Oil and Shale Gas Production Depends on Resources, Technology, Markets

States News Service; August 22, 2016

700+ words
WASHINGTON, DC -- The following information was released by the Energy Information Administration (EIA): Based on projections in the U.S. Energy Information Administration's Annual Energy Outlook 2016 (AEO2016), U.S. tight oil production is expected to reach 7.08 million barrels per day (b/d), and…
States News Service
Shale Gas Provides Largest Share of U.S. Natural Gas Production in 2013

States News Service; November 25, 2014

700+ words
WASHINGTON, DC -- The following information was released by the Energy Information Administration (EIA): Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-895, "Annual Quantity and Value of Natural Gas Production Report"; Form EIA-914, "Monthly Natural Gas Production Report"; the Bureau of…
States News Service
ICYMI: NEW REPORT HIGHLIGHTS DRAMATIC GROWTH AND JOBS POTENTIAL OF U.S. SHALE GAS PRODUCTION; SHALE GAS TO SUPPORT UP TO 870,000 JOBS BY 2015.

States News Service; December 6, 2011

420 words
WASHINGTON -- The following information was released by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce: A new report released today by IHS Global Insight underscores the positive economic impacts of U.S. shale gas production. Recent advances in extraction technologies have…
See all related articles »

Publication Finder

Browse back issues from our extensive library of more than 6,500 trusted publications.

Popular publicationson HighBeam Research

The Economist (US)
Political magazines
The Washington Post
Washington D.C. newspapers
The Christian Science Monitor
Religious magazines
The Nation
Political magazines
Harper's Magazine
Cultural magazines
Visit Cengage Brain
  • Company
  • About us
  • Subscription benefits
  • Group subscriptions
  • Careers
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Help topics
  • FAQ
  • Search tips
  • Using the Research Center
  • Billing questions
  • Rights inquiries
  • Customer Service
  • Cengage Learning Network
  • Questia
  • CengageBrain.com
  • HighBeam Business
  • ed2go
  • MiLadyPro
  •  
HighBeam Research
Follow us:

HighBeam Research is operated by Cengage Learning. © Copyright 2018. All rights reserved.

The HighBeam advertising network includes: womensforum.com GlamFamily